less-pleasing sequels

[snugglekitty]

First, there was Extras by Scott Westerfeld. This is the fourth book in the ill-named Uglies trilogy. (The author put a note in the front, thanking all of the readers who wrote telling him the true meaning of the word trilogy, which I found adorable.) The first three books, imo, were terrific. Alas, I didn't feel the fourth one was quite up to snuff. Why? Well, I didn't find the main character very sympathetic. I liked the world set-up, the plot, and the slang, though. It's worth a read if, like me, you loved the previous three books, and want to find out what happens to the world and the characters after they're over. Anyone who has not read the series should definitely read the first three books - the first is Uglies. As a side note, I felt puzzled by the name of Rodrigo Corral listed on some of these books, but not others. I looked him up, and discovered that he is responsible for the amazing cover art. Three stars.

Then there was With Child by Laurie R. King. I've been enjoying her gritty contemporary mysteries featuring Kate Martinelli. The previous two, A Grave Talent and To Play the Fool were both excellent. This did not do it for me quite as well. Probably because it is not a traditional mystery. The lost child described on the back cover is found before much of the action gets going. (That's not really a spoiler, and that's the problem.) It's a better piece of fiction than it is a mystery, if that makes sense. It was always clear to me who the "bad guy" was, and much of the plot was slow, even though it was satisfying. Thus, I am only able to give it three stars - but I would continue to read the series.